Shane Fagan » Firefox http://shanefagan.com A blog about Ubuntu, techonlogy, random stuff and opinions Sat, 31 Jul 2010 01:44:20 +0000 en hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0 Oh OGG when will it be your time….? http://shanefagan.com/2009/12/10/oh-ogg-when-will-it-be-your-time/ http://shanefagan.com/2009/12/10/oh-ogg-when-will-it-be-your-time/#comments Thu, 10 Dec 2009 23:56:42 +0000 Shane http://shanefagan.com/?p=554 Continue reading →]]> I’m an optimist, specifically for ubuntu and the open source/free software world. One thing that puzzles me is OGG Theora and Vorbis. We see Wikimedia (Wikipedia, wikidictonary…etc) using OGG technologies as well as mozilla, google and opera embracing it. It is included by default in nearly all linux distributions (I say nearly all because I cant think of any that dont but id say some don’t have it). They are the only freely distributable codecs around.

So why am I still unsure about OGG being used worldwide as the standard for audio/video files?
1. It wont be standardized as part of HTML5
2. MP3 although outdated are still installed on more devices sold on the market.
3. No big company is pushing its adoption
4. Even people who support free software have no reason to encode their library into free formats.
5. The ubuntu one music store (going by the meeting at the UDS) more than likely wont offer OGGs as a download option.
6. Google bought On2, so they might push VP8 to the main stage by using it in Google Chrome (the browser and the OS) and on Youtube as embedded HTML5 video.

I think at the moment more can be done to encourage the use of OGGs, comparing sizes and emphasizing the free part is all well and good but it doesn’t push it to the users. Its an aggressive market, MP3, MP4 and WMA all are pushed to the users by massive companies like Apple and Microsoft. Ubuntu, Fedora, Open Solaris, FreeBSD and Opensuse (there are loads i’m not going to list them all) all distribute OGG codecs but it just seems that not many users use them and thats a shame.

Me personally I don’t use them because I have way too much music and video to convert and there wouldn’t be much point because if I convert it all I will have a degradation in quality because each codec removes different parts of the tracks. Plus I have an iPod and that doesn’t play OGGs. (before anyone asks I looked into it and I couldn’t find any OGG players in any of the shops I visited in Ireland)

One thing I have to say as a great side note is that FLAC is the most used lossless codec around and that is such a awesome example of how a free software product can dominate just because its great.

]]> http://shanefagan.com/2009/12/10/oh-ogg-when-will-it-be-your-time/feed/ 33 Epiphany http://shanefagan.com/2009/10/02/epiphany/ http://shanefagan.com/2009/10/02/epiphany/#comments Fri, 02 Oct 2009 07:11:10 +0000 Shane http://shanefagan.com/?p=456 Continue reading →]]> I just tried the new version of epiphany in karmic that uses webkit and its very nice. Of course I did some moving around and removing of stuff from the UI but now its uncluttered and simple.
Epiphany
I have been a firefox user for about 3 years now but now firefox is becoming a little out of place. Its really strange when you try Epiphany because its like firefox but its more integrated but on the flip side its missing some features. The integration is great in very small little touches, its very integrated with GNOME’s theme and the address bar doubles as a progress bar for the page loading (I love that). Also everything can be moved or removed if the user wants (I love this too). The biggest difference is webkit, with webkit pages load nice and fast and it passes the acid3 test (unlike firefox).
Of course somethings annoy me about epiphany like the spell checker deletes words, why is there a tabs menu bar entry when its a button on the browser anyway? Why is there a go meny bar entry when that is on the browser anyway? Why is it so easy to just open the browser and view/edit all of the passwords without asking the user for a password?
So really I dont know which I will use, its a choice between full featured Firefox and fast and integrated Epiphany.

]]> http://shanefagan.com/2009/10/02/epiphany/feed/ 12 Theora and Vorbis, HTML and Google http://shanefagan.com/2009/08/13/theora-and-vorbis-htm-and-google/ http://shanefagan.com/2009/08/13/theora-and-vorbis-htm-and-google/#comments Thu, 13 Aug 2009 00:38:39 +0000 Shane http://shanefagan.wordpress.com/?p=271 Continue reading →]]> What an interesting company Google is they announced that they are buying On2. On2 is the company that provided the basis for OGG Theora by open sourcing the VP3 codec. Google, Mozilla and Opera all supported the addition of Theora to be included in the HTML 5 standard because they are free (Libre and Price) but were shot down by Apple and Nokia. Have a look here for more info
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ogg_controversy
Nokia’s opposition confuses me because they support Qt and the KDE project and they are open source. Apple support H.264 and dont want to use anything but H.264. Microsoft are even more interesting to me because they are completely missing from the HTML 5 discussion altogether. Maybe they dont need anything new because they will just use silverlight (and their users will use adobe flash)
For anyone who hasnt read the spec for HTML 5 look here.
Here is the quote that is causing all the trouble:

It would be helpful for interoperability if all browsers could support the same codecs. However, there are no known codecs that satisfy all the current players: we need a codec that is known to not require per-unit or per-distributor licensing, that is compatible with the open source development model, that is of sufficient quality as to be usable, and that is not an additional submarine patent risk for large companies. This is an ongoing issue and this section will be updated once more information is available.

If Google open sources the On2 codecs or simply offers an assurance that they wont sue for patents (This seems kinda similar to Microsoft’s community promise) there wont be anything stopping Theoras inclusion in HTML 5. The even more interesting thing is this http://www.youtube.com/html5. It is a HTML 5 prototype of youtube using the video tag with an mp4 file.
So Google is looking into replacing the Flash video with something different and maybe buying On2 will free Theora from the “submarine patent risk”. Its already been included in Firefox and its coming soon on Chrome and Opera so its gaining ground but still its a shame that Internet Exporer (Which is the default for Windows and is the most used in the market) and Safari (Which is the default for Mac) dont support it.
Google is a great supporter of Open Source so hopefully we will hear some good news from Google soon about Theora.
The only thing I want is to not use Adobe Flash anymore its way too heavy and should die with the introduction of not only the video tag but also using Java Script and SVG files.
On the Ubuntu front we should really make use of HTML 5 in http://video.ubuntu.com/ and http://screencasts.ubuntu.com/

Update: Found this post to the W3 mailing list from a Microsoft employee have a look http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2009Aug/0389.html

]]> http://shanefagan.com/2009/08/13/theora-and-vorbis-htm-and-google/feed/ 15 Flock a nice addition to the firefox family http://shanefagan.com/2009/02/28/flock-a-nice-addition-to-the-firefox-family/ http://shanefagan.com/2009/02/28/flock-a-nice-addition-to-the-firefox-family/#comments Sat, 28 Feb 2009 21:37:27 +0000 Shane http://shanefagan.wordpress.com/2009/02/28/flock-a-nice-addition-to-the-firefox-family/ Continue reading →]]> Flock is built on the firefox backend with a few nice additions.
1. WordPress is integrated into it (im using it to post this blog)
2. Social networks like twitter, facebook and myspace are also integrated in a sidebar for easy access.
3. Gmail and yahoo are in there too

It takes firefox and makes it more integrated way with socal networks and email. A few drawbacks are that everything that I mentioned above can be implemented better but this my come with time. For instance it has support for video feeds but doesnt sort it by when it was uploaded (I have feeds from Youtube and it shows me videos from oldest to newest). It may be built on the firefox backend but it still hasnt support for windows media files. All that being said it still adds something new to the browser wars but maybe should just be an addon to firefox and not a separate browser

]]> http://shanefagan.com/2009/02/28/flock-a-nice-addition-to-the-firefox-family/feed/ 0